View Source

Attendees

(copy your name to the appropriate category above)

Review of open action items
Feedback from infoshare questionnaire re-distribution - who, what and when?
- We will do that in the white paper (short summary)
Feedback from WP5 F2F and CTO workshop last week in Amsterdam
State of report writing: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XuKIn3wXe9-laNcbTUmAXznVrvrtQUWL_AfJmEc6-t8/edit
- review of work done
- distribute chapters to T7 members
- Feedbacks from earlier meeting:
  - Separate common concepts from implementation specific statements. The latter should be positioned such that readers will recognise it as not required to understand the main statements of the report. It is still welcomed to include such details to the benefit of the more tech-savvy subset of readers.
  - We would like to use the naming of OID4VCI/VP for the component, roles and actions in the general concepts (not all frameworks agree on the naming, so we have to make a choice). But still separate generic concepts from implementation specific statements.
  - All group is encouraged to review the text and to comment.

Action	Who	Deadline	Status
Review and comment the report	@all		open