|
|
|
Research communities have a need to express and potentially share certain trust marks on IdPs and SPs. These trust marks may differ from existing trust marks issued by identity federations, or may be put in to compliment existing ones, in case the federation operator does not support these, like e.g. in the case of SIRTFI. This project tries to implement a technical solution that matches the requirements as described by the SIRTFI community and investigates usability of the solution for research communities and the impact of the solution of Identity federations. It also explores potential other scenarios where a similar methodology could be used, like e.g. REFEDs MFA and in the context of the IdP self assessment tool that was developed in GN42 It does not consider itself with the questions on where and how such a tool would be used in the context of existing trust frameworks. |
Topic goals:
|
Sirtfi Registry Requirements: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wh2SQU62zDRwlJLPFgwxmRnIq7IiVgPf76XI97Hzt80 Use story description: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14pzjKo-QHWlGd5D0aRRzADSraPcDuf7HbUJrO_IbYqE/edit?ts=5c90ce9d |
Initial technical details: The project is supposed to represent a web portal, where users (i.e. dusters) will access using their federated credentials. The users will, upon invitation, be able to assert Sirtfi tag for the entity under their control. The flow will resemble https://access-check.edugain.org/ . The more detailed description can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hwdi7iO3v2U-RrzgT_EhL7AA0xkE9RIr_bQac2IhZ3M |
The current plan is to test the implementation, and to determine whether the trust model is satisfactory. Potentially, potential applications of the solution may extend the current Sirtfi+ use case. |
With the federated access and adhering to basic principles of Federated Identity Management (following DPCoCoV2 and, e.g., applicable AARC guidelines), no new issues regarding processing of personal data are foreseen. |
Work is done when the initial version is implemented and evaluated. |
When this Incubator project is completed, do you intend to continue using the solution? If yes, can you describe how you intent to sustain it? (E.g. through own staff, by using an e-Infrastructure provider, ...) <Enter here> |
Please provide pointers to completed and intermediary results of this activity |
Date | Activity | Owner | Minutes |
---|---|---|---|
Feb 18, 2017 | Kickoff meeting | ||
(Attach any documents to this page to get them listed.)